Editing Talk:Armored Cannon Larva
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
==Possible Combination with ACB Page?== | ==Possible Combination with ACB Page?== | ||
Anyone think we should combine the the article with the Armored Cannon Beetle page? I don't think we should since it has its own Piklopedia entry. I'm just curious, if enough people think so, then we could make a subheading on the page stating "Larva" or something like that.[[File:3 Pikmin.png|35px]][[User:Pikmin1254| | Anyone think we should combine the the article with the Armored Cannon Beetle page? I don't think we should since it has its own Piklopedia entry. I'm just curious, if enough people think so, then we could make a subheading on the page stating "Larva" or something like that.[[File:3 Pikmin.png|35px]][[User:Pikmin1254|<b><span style="color:blue">Pikmin</span></b>]][[File:Hairybulborb.jpg|30px]][[User talk:Pikmin1254|<b><span style="color:orange">1254</span></b>]][[File:Specialpikmin.JPG|35px]] | ||
:...No.--{{User:Prezintenden/sig}} | :...No.--{{User:Prezintenden/sig}} | ||
I was thinking the same thing. The real reason why I made this part of the discussion is just in case someone was thinking of doing that.[[File:3 Pikmin.png|35px]][[User:Pikmin1254| | I was thinking the same thing. The real reason why I made this part of the discussion is just in case someone was thinking of doing that.[[File:3 Pikmin.png|35px]][[User:Pikmin1254|<b><span style="color:blue">Pikmin</span></b>]][[File:Hairybulborb.jpg|30px]][[User talk:Pikmin1254|<b><span style="color:orange">1254</span></b>]][[File:Specialpikmin.JPG|35px]] | ||
==...what== | ==...what== | ||
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
I think we need to leave it as armored cannon beetle larva if we left red bulborb as it is --[[User:Nvortex|Nvortex]] ([[User talk:Nvortex|talk]]) 19:12, 31 October 2015 (EDT) | I think we need to leave it as armored cannon beetle larva if we left red bulborb as it is --[[User:Nvortex|Nvortex]] ([[User talk:Nvortex|talk]]) 19:12, 31 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
:It's rough. We should try to always use the most recent US name as the "official" one. But for the case of Bulborbs, we should stick with "Red Bulborb" simply because "Bulborb" is incredibly ambiguous. You can look at an Orange Bulborb and say "This is a Bulborb", and you'd be correct. But you can't say "This is a Red Bulborb". At the very least, we should wait for Pikmin 4 and see if that'll help us decide this deal better. We should see some Red Bulborb action in just a few weeks or months... I hope. — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 09:49, 1 November 2015 (EST) | :It's rough. We should try to always use the most recent US name as the "official" one. But for the case of Bulborbs, we should stick with "Red Bulborb" simply because "Bulborb" is incredibly ambiguous. You can look at an Orange Bulborb and say "This is a Bulborb", and you'd be correct. But you can't say "This is a Red Bulborb". At the very least, we should wait for Pikmin 4 and see if that'll help us decide this deal better. We should see some Red Bulborb action in just a few weeks or months... I hope. — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 09:49, 1 November 2015 (EST) | ||