Editing Pikipedia talk:Featured article
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Instructions== | |||
To update the featured article, you must: | |||
# Update the previous featured article to have the end date in the "featured" template, in the form ''<nowiki>{{featured|start date|end date}}</nowiki>''. Move this to the bottom of the page, but keep it above any footer. | |||
# Add the [[Template:Featured|Featured template]] to the top of the main article of the new feature, including the date, in the form ''<nowiki>{{featured|date}}</nowiki>'' (read the template documentation for more details). | |||
# Update the [[Pikipedia:Featured article#Previous featured articles|previous featured articles list]]. | |||
# Move the nomination on the [[Pikipedia:Featured article/nominations|nominations page]] to the [[Pikipedia:Featured article/past nominations|archive]]. | |||
# Update [[Template:Feature]]. Copy a few of the introductory paragraphs from the article and an image, if at all possible. | |||
# Tweet about the new featured article. | |||
# Post on Facebook about the new featured article and poll, and the old poll's results. | |||
---- | |||
==Comment== | ==Comment== | ||
Very helpful article. Hopefully, we get some users to submit some cool featured Pikmin articles if possible. | Very helpful article. Hopefully, we get some users to submit some cool featured Pikmin articles if possible. | ||
Line 23: | Line 35: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Should I change the featured article to [[Smokey Progg]] soon? ~~ '''Edit:''' Oops. {{User:Volatile Dweevil/ | Should I change the featured article to [[Smokey Progg]] soon? ~~ '''Edit:''' Oops. {{User:Volatile Dweevil/Vol2}} | ||
:I could swear it was featured previously. Guess not. Well, go for it. Also, you only... used two tildes... no matter. '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 08:18, 12 April 2011 (EDT) | :I could swear it was featured previously. Guess not. Well, go for it. Also, you only... used two tildes... no matter. '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 08:18, 12 April 2011 (EDT) | ||
Line 37: | Line 49: | ||
Now, Pikipedia's system has quite a bit of history behind it and is simple to understand, but I wonder if it would be worth slightly changing it to be like other wiki systems. This could be done by moving the "Ready nominations" from the nominations page into its own page of feature-worthy articles, and this page would also store previously featured articles that are still high-quality. (If articles dropped in quality, they could be removed from that list.) That way, we could have a catalog of articles featured on the 2 month cycle (the featured article history), and a list of the highest-quality articles on the wiki (the featured article list). Would it be worth making a change like this? — [[User:Soprano|'''Soprano''']]<sub>[[User talk:Soprano|''(talk)'']]</sub> 17:06, December 21, 2021 (EST) | Now, Pikipedia's system has quite a bit of history behind it and is simple to understand, but I wonder if it would be worth slightly changing it to be like other wiki systems. This could be done by moving the "Ready nominations" from the nominations page into its own page of feature-worthy articles, and this page would also store previously featured articles that are still high-quality. (If articles dropped in quality, they could be removed from that list.) That way, we could have a catalog of articles featured on the 2 month cycle (the featured article history), and a list of the highest-quality articles on the wiki (the featured article list). Would it be worth making a change like this? — [[User:Soprano|'''Soprano''']]<sub>[[User talk:Soprano|''(talk)'']]</sub> 17:06, December 21, 2021 (EST) | ||