Editing Forum:Strategy sections
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|Watercooler}} | {{Forumheader|Watercooler (Pikipedia)}} | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:It doesn't make much sense to me. They technically die as seen when their spirit flies out of their corpse. Maybe replacing the word ''Kill'' with ''Defeat'' may make it better.--{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}} | :It doesn't make much sense to me. They technically die as seen when their spirit flies out of their corpse. Maybe replacing the word ''Kill'' with ''Defeat'' may make it better.--{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}} | ||
::Feel free to revert them, BNK decided to change most of them entirely on his own. [[User:Miles|Miles.]] 13:26, May 21, 2010 (UTC) | ::Feel free to revert them, BNK decided to change most of them entirely on his own. [[User:Miles.|Miles.]] 13:26, May 21, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::I'm not sure 'how to kill' is best, though, 'cause you can't kill them all - what do you put for, say, Ravenous Whiskerpillar? You get inconsistencies. Using 'defeat' in its place does make a bit more sense, but 'how to X' seems a bit informal to me, and I expect that was the reasoning behind BNK changing them. I guess I'm for 'how to defeat' if there are no other ideas.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | :::I'm not sure 'how to kill' is best, though, 'cause you can't kill them all - what do you put for, say, Ravenous Whiskerpillar? You get inconsistencies. Using 'defeat' in its place does make a bit more sense, but 'how to X' seems a bit informal to me, and I expect that was the reasoning behind BNK changing them. I guess I'm for 'how to defeat' if there are no other ideas.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
::This is an encyclopedia. Please make it sound like it -[[User:Dark Lord Revan|Revan]] 08:50, June 2, 2010 (UTC) | ::This is an encyclopedia. Please make it sound like it -[[User:Dark Lord Revan|Revan]] 08:50, June 2, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::It isn't called Piki'''pedia''' for nothing. [[User:Sandflyer83|<b><span style="color:Crimson"><strike><u>'''''~Sand~Flyer~83,'''''</u></strike></span></b>]]'''''[[User talk:Sandflyer83|<span style="color:darkblue">(Talk)</span>]]''[[Image:102.gif|35px]][[Image:103.png|35px]]''' 04:30, June 3, 2010 (UTC) | ::It isn't called Piki'''pedia''' for nothing. [[User:Sandflyer83|<b><span style="color:Crimson"><strike><u>'''''~Sand~Flyer~83,'''''</u></strike></span></b>]]'''''[[User talk:Sandflyer83|<span style="color:darkblue">(Talk)</span>]]''[[Image:101.jpg|35px]][[Image:102.gif|35px]][[Image:103.png|35px]]''' 04:30, June 3, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::The style of writing in the section has little to do with the title, so I'm not quite sure who you're arguing against.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | :::The style of writing in the section has little to do with the title, so I'm not quite sure who you're arguing against.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
:::::::I agree with Jimbo Jambo on this one.--{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}} | :::::::I agree with Jimbo Jambo on this one.--{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}} | ||
::::::: | ::::::: Of course they will be strats. But they way they are now they blow up the unity of the pages. I cant put into words what I want the Title to be, but I want the sections to be worded like this "The mighty Red Bulborb may gulp up pikmin in one bite, but it is slow. Pikmin are able to either surround the creature before it can bite and defeat it, or they can use the weakpoint of the backside of the creature to defeat it without being harmed" | ||
:: | It needs to sound like an article, not a faq | ||
-[[User:Dark Lord Revan|Revan]] 01:22, June 15, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Yeah, he's right. {{User:Snakeboss14/sig}} | |||