Editing File talk:Forest navel.JPG

Jump to navigation Jump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
{{delete|main file requested for deletion}}
It's nice, but you really should have saved it as PNG.  It's a bit late now: low-quality JPG introduces artifacts like the ones all over the image.  Not sure if it would be easy to clean that up.  If you have an original of it or something, maybe a bitmap, that could be used instead.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}}
It's nice, but you really should have saved it as PNG.  It's a bit late now: low-quality JPG introduces artifacts like the ones all over the image.  Not sure if it would be easy to clean that up.  If you have an original of it or something, maybe a bitmap, that could be used instead.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}}


Line 9: Line 8:


::Something made by Paint isn't low-quality unless you save it as low-quality.  If you're using Vista, it saves it as JPG by default, whereas previous versions of Windows would use bitmap, which is perfect quality, but large in terms of filesize.  If you do have a bitmap or PNG original, upload it and I'll see if it's any better and switch things around for you as need be.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}}
::Something made by Paint isn't low-quality unless you save it as low-quality.  If you're using Vista, it saves it as JPG by default, whereas previous versions of Windows would use bitmap, which is perfect quality, but large in terms of filesize.  If you do have a bitmap or PNG original, upload it and I'll see if it's any better and switch things around for you as need be.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}}
:::BMP is unuplooadable perfection... {{User:Crystal_lucario/Sig}}
== Map Accuracy ==
I have some concerns about this map. For the most part, it is confined to the fact that what it labels as 'twigs' are in fact the bomb-rock deposits, while some gates are incorrectly (and confusingly) coloured. I am unsure how to address these errors short of making a new version, but would like to voice the opinion regardless so that someone with a better idea can offer it. [[User:Phineas81707|Phineas81707]] ([[User talk:Phineas81707|talk]]) 05:37, April 28, 2019 (EDT)
:Yeah, we definitely need a much better map. The things you pointed out are true, and the map's style in general deserves to be higher quality. I guess it'll have to stay until somebody creates something better. &mdash; '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 12:02, April 28, 2019 (EDT)

Please note that all contributions to Pikipedia are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (see Pikipedia:Copyrights for details). Your changes will be visible immediately. Please enter a summary of your changes above.

Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

This page is a member of 1 meta category: